| |
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
Option
Versus First Refusal: What's The Difference? |
|
By Peter
G. Miller
It's
been a good time to be a real estate owner in my community. During
the past few months several would-be purchasers have approached with
offers to buy property we own, even though the properties in
question were not listed for sale.
According
to the National Association of Realtors, it looks like 2003
will be another banner year for real estate re-sales. David Lereah,
the group's chief economist, predicts that we can expect "5.73
million existing-home sales this year, up 2.9 percent from a record
5.57 million sales in 2002." As to prices, NAR says "the
national median existing-home price is projected to rise 6.0 percent
this year to $167,800, while the median new-home price should
increase 3.8 percent to $194,700."
Given
the choice of being a buyer or a seller, the role of property owner
in a strong market sure seems easier. People seeking the opportunity
to give you money, no one is asking what you earned last year, and
you absolutely know that your favorite rug really does fit in the
living room. But sometimes it happens that properties are simply not
for sale. In our case, given a rising population and a strong local
economy we feel prices for these particular properties will continue
to rise above the rate of inflation and so now is not the best time
to sell. But
that doesn't mean we're closed to offers....
For
instance, for a property with development potential it might be
interesting if a buyer asked about a purchase option. It
could work like this: Suppose someone wanted an option to purchase
during the next two years in exchange for a given fee. We would look
at the current market value, add a given percentage, and charge a
non-refundable option fee. The holder of the option would then have
the right to purchase during the next two years at a given price. If
they didn't purchase, the value of the option fee would be lost.
Matters such as the current market value, percent increase,
agreement length, option fee and other terms would all be
negotiated.
Why would someone want an option? It may be because a given property has a key location, size or price. With an option, a buyer has locked-in the opportunity to purchase under given terms. If the market rises sufficiently, the option itself may represent a bargain for the purchaser. As to sellers, a sufficient option fee and/or a guaranteed price can be hard to ignore.
An
alternative approach might involve a "right of first
refusal." In this situation, there is no particular sale price,
merely an agreement that the right holders can match any legitimate
purchase offer that would otherwise be accepted during a given
period, say the next five years.
With
a right of first refusal a seller could not offer the property for
sale without noting that the purchase was "subject to" the
right of first refusal. Such a claim, in turn, might make the
property harder to sell and might be a drag on the price.
With
a right of first refusal there would be a fee paid by the
prospective buyer. The fee, the length of the agreement and all
terms would be negotiable.
A purchase option and a right of first refusal are not the same thing, but both may ultimately result in a transaction on terms which work for both buyers and sellers. Such documents, however, can be complex and should be reviewed by an attorney before acceptance.
|

Copyright © 2003 Dan Swango and Associates